Call on IGP to protect police credibility and  to stop giving information about the Al-Ma’unah arms heists in dribs and drabs with a lot of "holes" which raises more questions than answers


Media Statement
by Lim Kit Siang
 

(Ipoh,  Monday): Yesterday, the Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Norian Mai went on television to talk on the Al-Mau’nah arms heists and killings, stating that the Al-Ma'unah group had planned to use the Internet to declare jihad (holy war) against the government in a bid to  get the support of other quarters to create widespread chaos in the country.

This is the Bernama report of Norian’s interview, which was given front-page headline treatment by today’s Star:
 

Malaysians who have been following closely all news reports and government announcements on the Al-Ma’unah arms heists and killings will find problem with the credibility of Norian’s latest revelations because of the contradictions and inconsistencies in the various official accounts.

The following are some of the examples:
 

  1. After  the Prime Minister revealed on television last  Wednesday that several members of the  Al-Ma’unah gang, one armed with an M16 assault rifle equipped with a grenade launcher, left Sauk for Kuala Lumpur and attacked a brewery and a temple after the arms heists in Grik,  Malaysians were  told that the Carlsberg brewery in Shah Alam was attacked twice with a grenade launcher on July 3 at about 4 a.m. while  two grenades were launched at the Batu Caves Hindu temple complex on July 9 at about 2 a.m.  However all these grenades did no damage, as according to  Mahathir in the television interview, "nothing happened" as  "they did not know how to use the weapon effectively".  Mahathir also  said that the "group of between three to five people" who carried a M16 rocket launcher out of Sauk have all been caught and the weapon seized in Sungai Petani.
  2. Yesterday’s Sunday Star carried the following report entitled "Man with grenade launcher held under ISA":

The New Sunday Times  yesterday identified the person as Subki Omar and stated that the Police "initially" intended to charge Subki under section 8 of the Firearms (Increased Penalty) Act 1971 for possession of a grenade launcher, which carries a maximum 14 years’ jail and not less than six years strokes of the rotan.

As the police had all along claimed that only one M16-203 rocket-launcher had been missing from the Grik arms heists and which was subsequently recovered in Sungei Petani, it is safe to assume that this was the rocket-launcher which was used to shoot grenades at the Carlsberg brewery on July 3 at about 4 a.m. and the Hindu temple at Batu Caves on July 9 at about 2 a.m. except that the facts and events could not tally.

The first question is how this particular rocket launcher  could be used to shoot two grenades at the Hindu temple at Batu Caves on July 9 at about 2 a.m. when Subki was already arrested in Kuala Selangor on July 8 and took the police to Sungei Petani the next day to recover the rocket launcher?

The second question is that if the grenades at the Hindu temple at Batu Caves were not from the grenade launcher, then a similar question arises as to whether the grenades at the Carlsberg brewery were also from the rocket-launcher - unless there is another M16-203 rocket-launcher which is still at large and in circulation in unknown hands!
 
Thirdly, in his television interview on Wednesday, Mahathir was  talking about "a group of between three to five people" which took the M16 rocket launcher from Sauk to Kuala Lumpur "to spark unrest" but in Norian’s interview, it became "a group of three or four people".

Fourthly, Norian in his interview talked about "three targets" for the grenade attack. What is this third target apart from the reported Carlsberg brewery and the Hindu temple at Batu Caves?   Mingguan Malaysia’s Awang Sulung in his Sunday column "Bisik-Bisik Mingguan" said that the Guinness brewery at Shah Alam was also shot at.  Is this correct?

The giving of information in dribs and drabs is the worst information policy that could be adopted by the Police, especially on an important and sensitive issue like  the Al-Ma’unah arms heists and killings.

The Inspector-General of Police should realise that this is the time when the Police must be able to maintain unquestioned public credibility of its accounts about the Al-Ma’unah arms heists and killings, and that  contradictions and inconsistencies in different official accounts as to what actually happened, however minor, would only undermine the credibility gap of the government in general and the police in particular.

This is why I seriously urge the Inspector-General of Police to protect police credibility and  to stop giving information about the Al-Ma’unah arms heists in dribs and drabs with a lot of "holes" which raises more questions than answers.

What the police should do urgently is to give a full,fair, impartial and authoritative account with regard to the Al-Ma’unah arms heists and killings, to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth and not tailored to serve any vested political interests or  the  political agenda of any ruling party of the day.

(24/7/2000)


*Lim Kit Siang - DAP National Chairman