DAP will not pursue  legal proceedings on the constitutionality of the 10th Penang State Assembly meetings as the Penang State Government had acted on the DAP’s criticisms and regularised its earlier unconstitutional convening of first meeting of State Assembly on 18th December 2000


Speech
-
DAP Bukit Bendera ceramah
by
Lim Kit Siang 

(Penang,  Thursday): The DAP has decided not to pursue legal proceedings  to challenge the constitutionality of the Penang State Assembly meeting convened on 18th December 1999 and the legality of all bills and motions passed by it in the subsequent sittings as the Penang State Government had accepted and acted on the DAP’s criticisms and regularised its earlier unconstitutional convening of the first meeting of the Penang State Assembly.

The law on the matter is very clearly and simply set out in the Penang State Constitution.

Article 19 (1) of the Penang State Constitution vests powers on the Yang di-Pertua Negeri Pulau Pinang to summon the Penang State Assembly, but Article 8 provides that apart from two specific instances, the Yang di-Pertua Negeri  in the exercise of his functions shall act in accordance with the advice of the State Executive Council.

Article 8 of the Penang State Constitution reads:
 

The Constitution is therefore very clear that in exercising his powers under Article 19(1)  to summon the Legislative Assembly, the Yang di-Pertua Negeri must act on the advice of the State Executive Council.

In the case of the Penang State Government, the Penang State Executive Council was the last in Peninsula Malaysia to be formed after the Nov. 29, 1999 general election because of the political crisis among the Barisan Nasional component parties over MCA’s demand for  the post of a second Deputy Chief Minister and additional State Exco allocations.

The  ten State Executive Councillors were only sworn in before the  Penang Yang di-Pertua Negeri Tun Dr Hamdan Sheikh  Tahir  at Seri Mutiara on Thursday, December 16, 1999.  The swearing-in of the  new Exco was immediately followed by the holding of its first meeting at Komtar at 11.30am  an hour later.

However,  on 8th December, 1999, all the newly-elected Penang State Assemblymen had received notification by the Penang State Assembly informing them that the Yang di Pertua Negeri had issued a proclamation summoning the State Assembly to meet from December 18, 1999.

The notice sent out by the Penang State Assembly clerk, Kasim bin Md Isa reads:
 

The proclamation by the Yang di-Pertua Negeri and the State Assembly notification dated 8th December 1999 informing State Assembly members of the summoning of the State Assembly on December 18, 1999 contravened the State Constitution as no State Executive Council had been formed yet to advise the Yang di Pertua Negeri to exercise his powers under Article 19 (1) of the Constitution.

If the Penang State Assembly had been convened not in accordance with the provisions of the State Constitution, then all the bills and motions passed by the Penang State Assembly, whether in the December meeting or in future State Assembly meetings for the next five years, would be infected with illegality and unconstitutionality - and are null and void.

It would also mean that  Datuk Yahaya Abdul Hamid had been illegally elected Speaker of the Penang State Assembly.
 
I had warned as far back as December 14, 1999 that the convening of the first meeting of the tenth Penang State Assembly based on the royal proclamation and the state assembly notice of December 8, 1999 was unlawful and unconstitutional, as  no Executive Council had been formed yet to advise the Yang di Pertua Negeri to convene the State Assembly meeting.

Parliament faced the same constitutional quandary as the Penang State Assembly, as the first meeting of Parliament fixed for 18th December 1999 was fixed on the basis of a royal proclamation on 9th December 1999  and a parliamentary notice dated 13th December 1999 even before the Cabinet had its first meeting on December 15, 1999.

The remedy I proposed to rectify the constitutional quandary of the first meeting of Parliament was that the royal proclamation and parliamentary notice issued before the first meeting of Cabinet should be set aside, and a new royal proclamation and parliamentary notice for the first meeting of Parliament be issued after the first Cabinet meeting.

The same advice would apply to the first meeting of the Penang State Assembly scheduled for 18th December 1999 so to make lawful in compliance with the Penang State Constitution.

I have now been advised that the Penang State Government had acted on this advice, setting aside the first proclamation by the Yang di Pertua Negeri and the State Assembly notice for the first meeting of the State Assembly made before the State Exco had its first meeting on 16th December 1999.

Following the State Exco meeting of 16th December 1999, a new proclamation by the Yang di Pertua Negeri summoning the first meeting of the State Assembly on 18th December 1999 was issued, followed by a new notice by the Penang State Assembly Clerk,  Kassim bin Md Isa, Setiausaha to all State Assembly members, which reads:
 

With the setting aside of the earlier royal proclamation and State Assembly notice and the issue of a new royal proclamation on December 16, 1999 and State Assembly notice on December 17, 1999 after the State Exco had its first meeting, the State Government had regularised its earlier unconstitutional convening of the State Assembly.

Unfortunately, the Federal Government had refused to heed the advice of the DAP to similarly regularise the convening of the first meeting of Parliament on December 20, 1999, resulting in the constitutional case of the millennium, as all meetings of the new tenth Parliament, whether last month or for the next five years, will be  infected with illegality and unconstitutionality.

(13/1/2000)


*Lim Kit Siang - DAP National Chairman